IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v29y2020i5p339-351.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cognitive Dysfunction in Persons with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Concept Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Tingting Liu
  • Jung Eun Lee
  • Jing Wang
  • Song Ge
  • Changwei Li

Abstract

Although cognitive dysfunction is related to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), the concept has not yet been well defined. The purpose of this study was to define the concept of cognitive dysfunction in persons with T2DM and examine its defining attributes, antecedents, and consequences. Literature was retrieved from 2008 to 2018 by systematically searching the PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases. Based on 37 included studies, three defining attributes were identified: cognitive dysfunction is a recognized or unrecognized symptom, is characterized by a subtle decline in one or more cognitive domains, and is accompanied by pronounced structural changes observed in brain imaging. One major antecedent was diabetes-related or diabetes-specific pathological changes. Consequences included interference with diabetes self-management, nonadherence to recommended self-management behaviors, and a higher risk of having hypoglycemic events. The concept analysis provides a theoretical foundation that can be used to guide evaluations and interventions related to cognitive dysfunction in individuals with T2DM.

Suggested Citation

  • Tingting Liu & Jung Eun Lee & Jing Wang & Song Ge & Changwei Li, 2020. "Cognitive Dysfunction in Persons with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Concept Analysis," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 29(5), pages 339-351, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:29:y:2020:i:5:p:339-351
    DOI: 10.1177/1054773819862973
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1054773819862973
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1054773819862973?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:29:y:2020:i:5:p:339-351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.