IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v29y2020i3p169-176.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of the Care Environment Scale–Long-Term Care

Author

Listed:
  • Marie Boltz
  • Kyung Hee Lee
  • Joseph Shuluk
  • Michelle Secic

Abstract

A critical dimension of Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) activity in long-term care is an analysis of the care environment, that is, the way care and services are organized. The purpose of this study was to develop and pilot test a psychometrically sound tool that long-term care staff could use to assess the care environment and guide performance improvement activity. Focus groups with 57 interdisciplinary participants in five nursing homes developed initial items, with excellent content validity (item content validity index = 1.0) evaluated by an expert panel. Pilot testing of internal consistency of the Care Environment Scale–Long-Term Care (CES-LTC) was conducted in a web-based administration of the items by 425 interdisciplinary staff members in 30 nursing homes and four assisted living facilities. The CES-LTC is internally consistent (Cronbach’s alpha = .90) and accounts for approximately 71.6% of the total variance. The three factors extracted from the exploratory factor analysis are Institutional Values ( k = 6), Access to Resources ( k = 10), and Person-Centered Approaches ( k = 12). Intrarater reliability in a subsample of 66 registered nurses revealed good test-retest results (overall intraclass correlation coefficients [ICC] = 0.78). The CES-LTC appears to be a valid and reliable measure of staff perceptions of the care environment and may be used to actively engage staff in QAPI endeavors including root cause analyses and improvement activity.

Suggested Citation

  • Marie Boltz & Kyung Hee Lee & Joseph Shuluk & Michelle Secic, 2020. "Development of the Care Environment Scale–Long-Term Care," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 29(3), pages 169-176, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:29:y:2020:i:3:p:169-176
    DOI: 10.1177/1054773818801485
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1054773818801485
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1054773818801485?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:29:y:2020:i:3:p:169-176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.