IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v29y2020i3p157-168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“They Don’t Trust Us†: The Influence of Perceptions of Inadequate Nursing Home Care on Emergency Department Transfers and the Potential Role for Telehealth

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline E. Stephens
  • Elizabeth Halifax
  • Daniel David
  • Nhat Bui
  • Sei J. Lee
  • Janet Shim
  • Christine S. Ritchie

Abstract

In this descriptive, qualitative study, we conducted eight focus groups with diverse informal and formal caregivers to explore their experiences/challenges with nursing home (NH) to emergency department (ED) transfers and whether telehealth might be able to mitigate some of those concerns. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using a grounded theory approach. Transfers were commonly viewed as being influenced by a perceived lack of trust in NH care/capabilities and driven by four main factors: questioning the quality of NH nurses’ assessments, perceptions that physicians were absent from the NH, misunderstandings of the capabilities of NHs and EDs, and perceptions that responses to medical needs were inadequate. Participants believed technology could provide “the power of the visual†permitting virtual assessment for the off-site physician, validation of nursing assessment, “real time†assurance to residents and families, better goals of care discussions with multiple parties in different locations, and family ability to say goodbye.

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline E. Stephens & Elizabeth Halifax & Daniel David & Nhat Bui & Sei J. Lee & Janet Shim & Christine S. Ritchie, 2020. "“They Don’t Trust Us†: The Influence of Perceptions of Inadequate Nursing Home Care on Emergency Department Transfers and the Potential Role for Telehealth," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 29(3), pages 157-168, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:29:y:2020:i:3:p:157-168
    DOI: 10.1177/1054773819835015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1054773819835015
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1054773819835015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hsiu‐Hsin Tsai & Yun‐Fang Tsai, 2010. "Older nursing home residents’ experiences with videoconferencing to communicate with family members," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(11‐12), pages 1538-1543, June.
    2. Beate‐Christin Hope Kolltveit & Sally Thorne & Marit Graue & Eva Gjengedal & Marjolein M Iversen & Marit Kirkevold, 2018. "Telemedicine follow‐up facilitates more comprehensive diabetes foot ulcer care: A qualitative study in home‐based and specialist health care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 1134-1145, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiayu Li & Lipei Gu & Yujie Guo, 2019. "An educational intervention on foot self‐care behaviour among diabetic retinopathy patients with visual disability and their primary caregivers," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(13-14), pages 2506-2516, July.
    2. Josep Vidal-Alaball & Francesc López Seguí & Josep Lluís Garcia Domingo & Gemma Flores Mateo & Gloria Sauch Valmaña & Anna Ruiz-Comellas & Francesc X Marín-Gomez & Francesc García Cuyàs, 2020. "Primary Care Professionals’ Acceptance of Medical Record-Based, Store and Forward Provider-to-Provider Telemedicine in Catalonia: Results of a Web-Based Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-11, June.
    3. Nai-Hui Chien & Chin-Hsing Tsai & Hung-Ru Lin, 2022. "Lived Experiences of Newly Admitted to Long-Term Care Facilities among Older Adults with Disabilities in Taiwan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-17, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:29:y:2020:i:3:p:157-168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.