IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v23y2014i5p471-489.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational and Individual Attributes Influencing Patient Risk Detection

Author

Listed:
  • Laurel A. Despins

Abstract

This study examined organizational and individual variables impacting patient risk detection by Intensive Care Unit nurses and their decision to reduce the risk of failure to rescue. Thirty-four nurses were randomly assigned to two groups. A video of a manager and staff nurse patient safety discussion was used to prime one group to prioritize patient safety. Participants provided demographic information, received end-of-shift report on two fictional patients, experienced 52 alarm trials during a medication preparation scenario, and completed the Safety Attitude Questionnaire. No difference existed in risk detection; however, nurses who perceived their work environment quality to be good correctly ignored a clinically irrelevant alarm more often and were more apt to classify an alarm as irrelevant. They chose to reduce the risk of medication error rather than that of failure to rescue. This information can assist nurses to balance disregarding distractions with responding to potential patient risk signals.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurel A. Despins, 2014. "Organizational and Individual Attributes Influencing Patient Risk Detection," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 23(5), pages 471-489, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:23:y:2014:i:5:p:471-489
    DOI: 10.1177/1054773813490951
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1054773813490951
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1054773813490951?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:23:y:2014:i:5:p:471-489. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.