IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v18y2009i4p336-347.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Behavioral Indicators of Postoperative Pain in Older Adults With Delirium

Author

Listed:
  • Sheila A. Decker

    (The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston,TX, USA, Sheila.Decker@uth.tmc.edu)

Abstract

The undertreatment of postoperative pain in older adults with delirium is attributed, in part, to the inability to complete self-report pain assessment instruments. Patients’ loss of verbal skills to self-report pain and the lack of reliable and valid postoperative pain assessment instruments for use in older adults with delirium prompted the design of a study to identify common and subtle behavioral indicators of pain. Sixteen experienced registered nurses participating in four focus groups identified behavioral indicators of pain.Transcript analysis resulted in 89 behaviors indicative of pain. Seven researchers with expertise in pain and cognitive impairment in older adults reached 80% agreement on 22 behavioral indicators. The behavioral indicators were classified within one of four pain behavior categories (nonverbal cues/behaviors, vocalizations, facial expressions, and change in usual behavior), and each behavioral indicator was identified as common or subtle. Findings provide evidence of content validity for the pain behaviors.

Suggested Citation

  • Sheila A. Decker, 2009. "Behavioral Indicators of Postoperative Pain in Older Adults With Delirium," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 18(4), pages 336-347, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:18:y:2009:i:4:p:336-347
    DOI: 10.1177/1054773809341734
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1054773809341734
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1054773809341734?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:18:y:2009:i:4:p:336-347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.