IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v16y2007i1p72-78.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nursing Home Error and Level of Staff Credentials

Author

Listed:
  • Jill Scott-Cawiezell

    (University of Missouri-Columbia, scottji@missouri.edu)

  • Ginette A. Pepper

    (University of Utah, Salt Lake City)

  • Richard W. Madsen

    (University of Missouri-Columbia)

  • Greg Petroski

    (University of Missouri-Columbia)

  • Amy Vogelsmeier

    (University of Missouri-Columbia)

  • Dave Zellmer

    (University of Missouri-Columbia)

Abstract

Providing safe nursing home care is both a clinical and fiscal challenge in many countries. The fiscal realities result in the addition of other workers, such as medication technicians or aides (CMT/A), to the health care team. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of various levels of credentialing among nursing home staff who deliver medications (RN, LPN, or CMT/A) on medication error. In addition, the impact of distractions and interruptions was explored. Using naïve observation, 39 medication administrators representing various levels of credentialing were unobtrusively observed to determine the number of medication errors, distractions, and interruptions in five nursing homes. There were no differences in medication error rates by level of credential. However, RNs had more interruptions during their medication administration, and these increased interruptions were associated with increased medication error rates when wrong time errors were excluded ( p = .0348).

Suggested Citation

  • Jill Scott-Cawiezell & Ginette A. Pepper & Richard W. Madsen & Greg Petroski & Amy Vogelsmeier & Dave Zellmer, 2007. "Nursing Home Error and Level of Staff Credentials," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 16(1), pages 72-78, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:16:y:2007:i:1:p:72-78
    DOI: 10.1177/1054773806295241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1054773806295241
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1054773806295241?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:16:y:2007:i:1:p:72-78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.