IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v12y2003i3p266-281.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tool Development for Measuring Caller Satisfaction and Outcome with Telephone Advice Nursing

Author

Listed:
  • Susan Randles Moscato
  • Marion David
  • Barbara Valanis
  • Christina M. Gullion
  • Christine Tanner
  • Susan Shapiro
  • Shikego Izumi
  • Ann Mayo

Abstract

Caller descriptions and evaluations of their experiences with telephone advice services provide unique information that correlates highly with objective measures of quality and can help interpret data from other sources. An author-developed questionnaire assessed caller outcomes of telephone nursing advice. In Phase I an iterative, purposive sample of 40 callers was interviewed by phone. An emergent design was used to develop questions, analyze constructs of interest, and test questions for a draft caller questionnaire, which was tested in Phase II. Responses to the questionnaire provided information about caller characteristics, advice call characteristics, and nurse practice behaviors that caused the authors to further revise the questionnaire. The resulting tool provides feedback to advice nurses about the outcomes of their practice and information to design orientation and development programs and support fund allocation decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Susan Randles Moscato & Marion David & Barbara Valanis & Christina M. Gullion & Christine Tanner & Susan Shapiro & Shikego Izumi & Ann Mayo, 2003. "Tool Development for Measuring Caller Satisfaction and Outcome with Telephone Advice Nursing," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 12(3), pages 266-281, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:12:y:2003:i:3:p:266-281
    DOI: 10.1177/1054773803253961
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1054773803253961
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1054773803253961?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:12:y:2003:i:3:p:266-281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.