IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v12y2003i2p174-204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What's New on Defining Diarrhea in Tube-Feeding Studies?

Author

Listed:
  • Kelly J. Lebak
  • Donna Zimmaro Bliss
  • Kay Savik
  • Kathleen M. Patten-Marsh

Abstract

Nurses who are involved in studies of tube-feeding tolerance or who review the literature on this topic are confronted with a myriad of definitions and methods of reporting diarrhea. In a 1992 study, the authors reported that these definition differences influenced results. In a review of the current literature, they determined that little progress had been made toward standardizing definitions and reports of diarrhea in studies of tube feeding. A secondary analysis of stool characteristics of hospitalized patients using various definitions of diarrhea showed there was a positive association between stool frequency and consistency. Criteria for stool consistency in the definitions of diarrhea appeared to have a greater influence on diarrhea outcomes when stool frequency was low. The authors suggest recognition of a taxonomy of definitions of diarrhea in the absence of consensus, which will help guide the design of future investigations and facilitate the evaluation and utilization of research.

Suggested Citation

  • Kelly J. Lebak & Donna Zimmaro Bliss & Kay Savik & Kathleen M. Patten-Marsh, 2003. "What's New on Defining Diarrhea in Tube-Feeding Studies?," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 12(2), pages 174-204, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:12:y:2003:i:2:p:174-204
    DOI: 10.1177/1054773803012002005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1054773803012002005
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1054773803012002005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:12:y:2003:i:2:p:174-204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.