IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/chnrpt/v61y2025i1p133-152.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Limits of China’s Sharp Power in Israel’s Academic and Media Discourse

Author

Listed:
  • Mordechai Chaziza

    (Department of Politics and Governance and the division of Multidisciplinary Studies in Social Science, Ashkelon Academic College, Israel. motih1308@gmail.com)

  • Carmela Lutmar

    (School of Political Sciences, University of Haifa, Israel. clutmar@poli.haifa.ac.il)

Abstract

The term ‘sharp power’ has become a widely used concept in international relations to describe external influence targeting democracies. China employs sharp power statecraft to shape public perceptions in target countries, aiming to alter opinions and behaviour, undermine political systems and create a favourable consensus by manipulating information. This study explores the nature and impact of China’s sharp power on the democratic resilience of Israeli society, particularly within academic and media discourse. The main argument is that China has attempted, albeit with limited success, to establish influence and shape public opinion in Israel through manipulation and censorship. However, these efforts have failed mainly due to the Israeli public’s scepticism and growing awareness of China’s broader geopolitical ambitions. Additionally, China’s pro-Palestinian stance and its alignment with Iran and the ‘axis of resistance’ have further hindered its ability to gain support, as these positions conflict with Israel’s core interests and values.

Suggested Citation

  • Mordechai Chaziza & Carmela Lutmar, 2025. "The Limits of China’s Sharp Power in Israel’s Academic and Media Discourse," China Report, , vol. 61(1), pages 133-152, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:chnrpt:v:61:y:2025:i:1:p:133-152
    DOI: 10.1177/00094455241299974
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00094455241299974
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00094455241299974?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:chnrpt:v:61:y:2025:i:1:p:133-152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.