IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/chnrpt/v49y2013i4p385-397.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dilemma and Domestic Uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Fu-Kuo Liu

Abstract

Maritime territorial disputes have become a hot issue in regional security and a pressing issue for Taiwan’s national security. While Taiwan is persistently claiming sovereign right over the large part of the South China Sea based on the U-shaped line, its role is however weakened as a result of the cross-strait hostility and its prolonged hands-off policy. Of course, its ambiguous international status, difficult relation with mainland China and domestic political confusion on nation’s future have more to do with its inactive role in the South China Sea disputes. This insecurity contributes to its ambivalent policy. This articleintends to address Taiwan’s legitimate claim for the part of the South China Sea, which has been unknown and neglected by the international community, and examine the reasons why Taiwan had taken inactive policy toward the South China Sea. Alerted by recent aggressive moves of other claimants, Taiwan is now shifting to a reasonable tougher strategy in the South China Sea. The articlealso projects the course of fresh efforts made by the Taiwan government pressurised by the public with increasing awareness of urgency.

Suggested Citation

  • Fu-Kuo Liu, 2013. "Dilemma and Domestic Uncertainty," China Report, , vol. 49(4), pages 385-397, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:chnrpt:v:49:y:2013:i:4:p:385-397
    DOI: 10.1177/0009445513506635
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0009445513506635
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0009445513506635?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:chnrpt:v:49:y:2013:i:4:p:385-397. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.