Author
Listed:
- J. Scott Hauger
(J. Scott Hauger, College of Security Studies, Asia Pacific Center for Security Studies, Honolulu, HI, USA. E-mail: haugers@apcss.org)
- Michael Daniels
(Michael Daniels, Independent Scholar, Honolulu, HI, USA. E-mail: Mikedaniels98@gmail.com)
- Lora Saalman
(Lora Saalman, Associate Professor, College of Security Studies, Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies, Honolulu, HI, USA. E-mail: saalmanl@apcss.org)
Abstract
Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) provide an important resource to good governance involving complex issues of environmental security. We explore that role by looking at recent campaigns concerned with security at the coal–water nexus in India and China, undertaken by regional arms of Greenpeace, an important international NGO. We find that, at the national level, the impact of NGOs on environmental governance depends deeply on an organization’s relation to government. In China, Greenpeace East Asia serves the government’s interest by providing an external source of information on activities and perceptions at the provincial level. An NGO such as Greenpeace East Asia is perceived as valuable and is tolerated as long as it acts in accordance with the unwritten rules of engagement with the government, as practiced by domestic NGOs. Greenpeace India, by comparison, is one among many NGOs, tolerated as a matter of democratic principle, but suspect because of its international connections. Greenpeace India has yet to have a meaningful impact on governance at the coal–water nexus. Greenpeace East Asia, on the other hand, appears to have found a role that can impact environmental governance, but is dependent upon operating within bounds that are set by the Chinese model of government.
Suggested Citation
J. Scott Hauger & Michael Daniels & Lora Saalman, 2014.
"Environmental Security and Governance at the Water–Energy Nexus: Greenpeace in China and India,"
Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, , vol. 1(3), pages 235-261, December.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:asseca:v:1:y:2014:i:3:p:235-261
DOI: 10.1177/2347797014551265
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:asseca:v:1:y:2014:i:3:p:235-261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.