IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v634y2011i1p98-116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Meaning, Measurement, and Implications of Racial Resentment

Author

Listed:
  • Edward G. Carmines

    (Indiana University)

  • Paul M. Sniderman

    (Stanford University)

  • Beth C. Easter

    (Indiana University)

Abstract

A new racism, it is claimed, has become a dominant feature of contemporary American politics. According to the theory’s originators, the new racism has largely replaced the old racism, which was based on the alleged biological inferiority of blacks. The new racism, referred to as “symbolic racism†or, more recently, “racial resentment,†by contrast, is defined as a conjunction of anti-black feelings and American moral traditionalism. According to its proponents, this new racism now structures and dominates the racial thinking of whites generally. Howard Schuman has suggested, however, that the index used to measure racial resentment may be fundamentally flawed because it may be conflated with the measurement of attitudes toward racial policies. The authors’ analysis supports Schuman’s suggestion. They conclude that racial resentment is not a valid measure of racism, which raises questions about the extent to which a new racism now dominates the thinking of white Americans.

Suggested Citation

  • Edward G. Carmines & Paul M. Sniderman & Beth C. Easter, 2011. "On the Meaning, Measurement, and Implications of Racial Resentment," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 634(1), pages 98-116, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:634:y:2011:i:1:p:98-116
    DOI: 10.1177/0002716210387499
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716210387499
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0002716210387499?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:634:y:2011:i:1:p:98-116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.