IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v631y2010i1p89-108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Indicators and the Federal Statistical System: An Essential but Fraught Partnership

Author

Listed:
  • Norman M. Bradburn

    (University of Chicago, National Opinion Research Center (NORC), American Academy of Arts and Sciences)

  • Carolyn J.E. Fuqua

    (senior research associate at NORC, University of Chicago)

Abstract

An indicator can be defined as a statistic used as part of an assessment exercise. There have been three relatively distinct waves of interest in indicators at the national level. Indicator work creates both opportunities and hazards for federal statistical agencies. Indicators not only increase the accessibility of federal statistics but also expose statistical agencies to charges of partisanship that can jeopardize both the credibility of their products and the agencies’ abilities to accomplish their core mission of collecting data from an increasingly wary public. Managing the tension between the scientific and political dimensions of indicator work involves acknowledging the value-laden nature of indicator development and establishing a clear division of labor, with political entities assuming responsibility for grappling with the most obviously normative issues and statistical agencies limiting their involvement in such work to the provision of statistical scientific expertise.

Suggested Citation

  • Norman M. Bradburn & Carolyn J.E. Fuqua, 2010. "Indicators and the Federal Statistical System: An Essential but Fraught Partnership," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 631(1), pages 89-108, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:631:y:2010:i:1:p:89-108
    DOI: 10.1177/0002716210374289
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716210374289
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0002716210374289?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:631:y:2010:i:1:p:89-108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.