IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v549y1997i1p10-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ideology and Independent Living: Will Conservatism Harm People with Disabilities?

Author

Listed:
  • ANDREW I. BATAVIA

Abstract

The prospect of a conservative revolution has raised the anxiety of the predominantly liberal disability leadership. Whether the diverse disability community shares the policy objectives of the leadership, and its concern over the conservative agenda, is not clear. This article considers four major branches of the conservative movement—fiscal conservatism, the federalist movement, social and religious conservatism, and libertarianism—and their compatibility with the independent living movement, a social movement supported by most people with disabilities. It concludes that the two social movements have several consistent tenets, such as individual responsibility, personal and economic freedom, and self-reliance. Conversely, liberal policies, which tend to encourage dependency, appear in direct conflict with the independent living philosophy. The Americans with Disabilities Act is examined as a disability policy that is largely consistent with conservative principles. The article concludes that, to achieve their policy goals, people with disabilities should seek representation on both sides of the political aisle and should develop proposals that will be acceptable to conservatives and moderates as well as liberals.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew I. Batavia, 1997. "Ideology and Independent Living: Will Conservatism Harm People with Disabilities?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 549(1), pages 10-23, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:549:y:1997:i:1:p:10-23
    DOI: 10.1177/0002716297549001002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716297549001002
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0002716297549001002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:549:y:1997:i:1:p:10-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.