IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v521y1992i1p175-188.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to Maximize Utilization of Evaluation Research by Policymakers

Author

Listed:
  • DOUGLAS S. LIPTON

Abstract

To conduct evaluation research and prepare reports that are most likely to be utilized by policymakers, one must understand the policymakers' perception of research and researchers. Policymakers believe it is their job to carry out their constituents' demands regardless of the results of evaluation research—only one contending judgment among many desiderata. The quality of the research is extraneous to making decisions. The more complex the evaluation, the more jargon, the more equivocal the conclusions, the more caveats in the preamble, the more sensitive the issue, the more complex the writing, the more obscure the evaluator, the more apt that the report will be discarded by policymakers and legislators. Their attitude mandates reporting that focuses on findings critical to policy issues, presents jargon-free findings concisely and clearly, avoids making recommendations, and relegates discussions of methodology to the appendix.

Suggested Citation

  • Douglas S. Lipton, 1992. "How to Maximize Utilization of Evaluation Research by Policymakers," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 521(1), pages 175-188, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:521:y:1992:i:1:p:175-188
    DOI: 10.1177/0002716292521001011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716292521001011
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0002716292521001011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:521:y:1992:i:1:p:175-188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.