IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v472y1984i1p61-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Opinion, Polling, and Political Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • MICHAEL MARGOLIS

Abstract

The advent of scientific public opinion polling gave democratic governance a new dimension. For the first time representatives could discern people's opinions on virtually any public issue. Despite this ability, three important questions remain. Are people adequately informed to consider the complex problems of modern government? Will they give their true opinions to a pollster? And even if these two conditions are satisfied, do representatives have to be bound by popular opinion? This article argues that modern public opinion analysts who use polling data tend to ignore these questions and instead focus on patterns of attitudes among various groups in the population. Before scientific polling became common, those who studied public opinion directed their efforts to the connection between behavioral manifestations of public opinion and the development of public policy. They worried more about the role of public opinion in the formulation of public policy. It turns out that much of the public opinion literature preceding scientific polling remains relevant, and we ignore it at our peril.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Margolis, 1984. "Public Opinion, Polling, and Political Behavior," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 472(1), pages 61-71, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:472:y:1984:i:1:p:61-71
    DOI: 10.1177/0002716284472001006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716284472001006
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0002716284472001006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Walker, Jack L., 1966. "A Critique of the Elitist Theory of Democracy," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 60(2), pages 285-295, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emmanuel Terkimbi Akov, 2015. "Fuel Subsidy Corruption and the Illusions of Economic Reconstruction in Nigeria," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 4, March.
    2. Aleksandra Praščević, 2017. "Political Economy Of Misusing Income Distribution In The Electoral Process – Biased Pluralism Approach," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 62(214), pages 7-44, June - Se.
    3. Reniko Gondo & Oluwatoyin D. Kolawole & Joseph E. Mbaiwa, 2019. "Dissonance in customary and statutory water management institutions: issues of cultural diversity in the management of water resources in the Okavango Delta, Botswana," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 1091-1109, June.
    4. Trudi C. Miller, 1992. "The Implications of Self-Interest," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 4(4), pages 395-412, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:472:y:1984:i:1:p:61-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.