IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v461y1982i1p63-73.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Childhood Lead Toxicity: a Paradox of Modern Technology

Author

Listed:
  • SARA SULLIVAN MEDLEY

Abstract

Lead toxicity, a man-made disease of young children, has only recently come to the focus of professional and public awareness. Lead has become increasingly bioavailable to humans as a direct result of industrial processing and manufacturing. While lead-based paint in older dwellings is the primary cause of lead toxicity among young children, airborne lead from gasoline fumes and factory emissions, plus dirt and dust into which high concentrations of lead have settled, are also significant sources of undue exposure. A variety of consumer products, including kitchen utensils, newsprint, and cosmetics are likewise potentially hazardous because of their high lead content. Exposure to excessive amounts of lead is especially harmful for young children: they are biologically and developmentally more vulnerable to its toxic effects. Even at levels of absorption that produce no medical symptoms, lead may impede children's overall developmental progress by interfering with their performance in several crucial areas. Although the United States has been reluctant to assume an aggressive regulatory position toward lead, the federal government currently supports comprehensive lead poisoning control programs in 60 American cities. The future of these programs is jeopardized by the shift from categorical to block grants. Unless continued funding is made available for lead management programs and a strong regulatory stance is assumed toward lead, young children will continue to become afflicted with this debilitating, yet preventable, illness.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Sullivan Medley, 1982. "Childhood Lead Toxicity: a Paradox of Modern Technology," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 461(1), pages 63-73, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:461:y:1982:i:1:p:63-73
    DOI: 10.1177/0002716282461000007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716282461000007
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0002716282461000007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:461:y:1982:i:1:p:63-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.