IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v402y1972i1p67-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Political Trends in China since the Cultural Revolution

Author

Listed:
  • Harry Harding

Abstract

The Cultural Revolution left two major legacies to China. First, basic social, economic, and organizational policies were undecided. Second, political power belonged to a shaky coalition of political forces, with widely divergent interests and policy preferences. Since 1969, China has sought to cope with these two legacies. But as Chinese leaders tried to formulate specific policies that could attract general support, conflict within the coalition mounted, resulting in the purge of important central and provincial leaders. The outcome of these two processes—the redefinition of policy and the re-allocation of power—constitutes the Thermidorean reaction to the Cultural Revolution. Policy has drifted rightward, and ultraleftism has been condemned. Many victims of the Cultural Revolution have been restored to office, while many of those associated with Red Guard radicalism and military participation in politics, particularly Ch'en Po-ta and Lin Piao, have been purged. Although most outstanding policy questions have by now been resolved, at least temporarily, the problem of the fragmentation of political power in China remains. Power still belongs to a heterogeneous coalition, which could easily fall apart in the event of an international crisis or the death of Mao.

Suggested Citation

  • Harry Harding, 1972. "Political Trends in China since the Cultural Revolution," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 402(1), pages 67-82, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:402:y:1972:i:1:p:67-82
    DOI: 10.1177/000271627240200106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000271627240200106
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/000271627240200106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:402:y:1972:i:1:p:67-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.