IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v391y1970i1p46-55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two Critics in Search of a Bias: A Response to Currie and Skolnick

Author

Listed:
  • Neil J. Smelser

    (University of California at Berkeley)

Abstract

This essay is mainly a response to the foregoing one, in which Elliott Currie and Jerome Skolnick attempt to find an antidemocratic, irrationalist, "LeBonist" bias in my book, Theory of Collective Behavior. After noting some errors and misinterpretations in their essay, I attempt to dem onstrate that they take one of my several determinants and inflate it into an explanation, that they collapse several attributes that are analytically separate in my work, and that they turn my selection of determinants into simple value- preferences. The essay concludes with a general discussion of the issue of "discrediting" adherents to social movements by analyzing their ideologies in terms of determinants other than those contained in the ideologies themselves. I attempt to spell out my own position on these matters, and to locate some inconsistencies in Skolnick's approach to protest move ments in The Politics of Protest.

Suggested Citation

  • Neil J. Smelser, 1970. "Two Critics in Search of a Bias: A Response to Currie and Skolnick," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 391(1), pages 46-55, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:391:y:1970:i:1:p:46-55
    DOI: 10.1177/000271627039100105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000271627039100105
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/000271627039100105?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:391:y:1970:i:1:p:46-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.