IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v355y1964i1p31-41.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Foster-Family Care: Has It Fulfilled Its Promise?

Author

Listed:
  • Mary Lewis

    (School of Social Work, Tulane University, Orleans, Louisiana)

Abstract

Foster-family care seems to promise children who must leave their own home for some type of foster care the closest approximation to normal life in their own home. The close and continuing relationship with responsible adults and the opportunities to participate in family and community life should provide a corrective and growth experience for the children in care. Casework services with parents should enable them to re-establish a home for their children or to move ahead on permanent planning for their children. The effectiveness of the use of foster-family care is tested against its promise. Inescap ably the conclusion must be that it has failed to meet the expectations of social agencies and communities. A disappoint ing proportion of children return to parents or are placed for adoption; ever growing numbers of children are remaining for long periods in foster-family care. For the latter children, the prospect seems bleak and unrewarding. Parents are "lost" to many of the children; many children exhibit emotional and social problems. As the conditions under which care has been given are examined, it becomes painfully clear that, for many children, the promise of foster-family care was doomed to fail from the start. But it is also clear that the promise is there if the profession, the social agencies, and the communities pursue a dedicated, thoughtful approach to its fulfillment. In the dis tress over what has happened to many children, it should not be forgotten that, for many others, foster-family care did provide security, love, and opportunity for a new and better life.

Suggested Citation

  • Mary Lewis, 1964. "Foster-Family Care: Has It Fulfilled Its Promise?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 355(1), pages 31-41, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:355:y:1964:i:1:p:31-41
    DOI: 10.1177/000271626435500104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000271626435500104
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/000271626435500104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:355:y:1964:i:1:p:31-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.