Author
Abstract
The common conviction throughout current debate on the American trade-union movement is that the need is serious for self-analysis and appraisal of union policies, struc tures, operations, and personnel. Examination by an internal body is necessary. There is agreement within the trade-union movement that the need is great for vigorous propagation of unionism among the unorganized—as well as for organizing the organized. In the area of collective bargaining, the unions must develop a rounded program for dealing with changing economic tides affecting the general economy and the indi vidual bargaining units and must work out methods of aiding workers in gaining income security and access to facilities for job and personal adjustment. In recent times, the union posi tion has been defensive rather than aggressive. At the same time that the trade-union movement seeks to enhance the posi tion of its members, it must respond to the call to adjust its collective-bargaining demands and strategy to the national and public interests and to participate responsibly in defining their meaning. Examination and adjustment of relations be tween the rank-and-file membership and the union leadership are a challenge to the movement. Also, structural adjustments at federation and union levels are indicated in view of changes in the general economy, job structures, business organizations, and political policy. The burden for action is on the official union leadership. A trade-union commission established to conduct a full-dress self-examination of the movement would be a salutary method of beginning the revitalization.—Ed.
Suggested Citation
Solomon Barkin, 1963.
"The Road to the Future: A Trade-Union Commission for Self-Analysis,"
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 350(1), pages 138-147, November.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:anname:v:350:y:1963:i:1:p:138-147
DOI: 10.1177/000271626335000116
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:350:y:1963:i:1:p:138-147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.