IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v349y1963i1p14-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Persistence of Tradition in Chinese Foreign Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Mancall

    (Harvard University)

Abstract

Communications are poor between Communist China and both the Soviet Union and the United States. Ac cording to the traditional Chinese world view, the world order was hierarchical, not egalitarian, with the central authority being China; Chinese centrality was a function of civilization and virtue; the world hierarchy was universal; national power was the reflection of national virtue; external society was the extension of internal society. The tribute system and the use of physical and economic power in times of strength and the technique of "divide and rule" in periods of weakness were tactics which enabled China to maintain pre-eminence. China and Russia evaded clash for purposes of commerce. The great and unresolved challenge to the Chinese system came from the Western maritime powers. European imperialism forced China to recognize the existence of an alternative international power materially more powerful than China and broke down the au tonomous Sinitic world order. The breakdown of the institu tions of the traditional world system after 1842 took place faster than the erosion of the assumptions on which the order was based. Survivals of the tradition in Communist China grow into and reinforce modern nationalism and provide China with a distinct sense of superiority over all foreigners, includ ing Russians. Accommodation between Peking and Moscow, if it comes, will, of necessity, be conscious and contrived.—Ed.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Mancall, 1963. "The Persistence of Tradition in Chinese Foreign Policy," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 349(1), pages 14-26, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:349:y:1963:i:1:p:14-26
    DOI: 10.1177/000271626334900103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000271626334900103
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/000271626334900103?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:349:y:1963:i:1:p:14-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.