IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v339y1962i1p1-10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The American Penal System: Spirit and Technique

Author

Listed:
  • Louis B. Schwartz

    (University of Pennsylvania Law School)

Abstract

One can speak only loosely of an American penal system. Fifty states each exercise virtually complete inde pendence in the criminal law field. The federal government is not specifically granted powers under the Constitution to en act criminal legislation, but a comprehensive body of criminal law has evolved through the exercise of other constitutional powers. Thus, at present, criminal laws and aims of the penal system are diverse. Certain influences, however, have affected the development of all the penal codes. These influences are the English common law, Puritan standards of the seventeenth century, and the American frontier. From the frontier comes the emphasis upon lay participation in the legal process. This is clearly represented in the institution of the jury and in its effect upon law, precedent, and court procedures. The gen eral American and English hostility to ideology, fully as much as the lay element, has served as a brake upon codification and radical reform. As a result, the American penal system tends to be anarchic, complicated, naively moralistic, and lay- determined, but it is, at the same time, experimental, creative, and progressively more merciful. With the passing of the frontier and the receding into history of Puritan theocracy, the forces which produced the current penal system are yield ing to new influences. The Model Penal Code, profoundly American in spirit and technique, would end the dependence of the penal code upon the common law and offers system and precision in place of frustration and bafflement.—Ed.

Suggested Citation

  • Louis B. Schwartz, 1962. "The American Penal System: Spirit and Technique," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 339(1), pages 1-10, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:339:y:1962:i:1:p:1-10
    DOI: 10.1177/000271626233900102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000271626233900102
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/000271626233900102?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:339:y:1962:i:1:p:1-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.