Author
Abstract
Although there are many issues about which China and the Soviet Union could quarrel and although there is strong evidence of some disagreements, the two regimes have an overwhelming common motive for maintaining soli darity against the outside world so long as both remain com mitted to Communist orthodoxy. Many of the predictions of future Sino-Soviet conflict erroneously assume that the Communist leaders, no matter what they say, play the tradi tional game of power politics. In fact, considerations of boundary, population, and so on are less important to the Communists than differences over the strategy which they should follow in their struggle against the non-Communist world. The Chinese position might be described as Marxist fundamentalism. There are two basic issues in the disagree ment : the actual balance of power between Communist and non-Communist sections of the world, and the ability of non- Communist leaders, especially in the United States, to act in terms of rational self-interest. Since the controversy is en tirely over strategy and timing, it does not necessarily involve any disruption of basic Communist solidarity. It may well become less heated if Chinese leaders come to realize that the balance of power in their favor is less decisive than they have claimed and if Soviet policy toward non-Communist powers becomes somewhat more intransigent to meet Chinese criticism. Soviet leadership by Khrushchev or in his spirit makes other developments less likely.—Ed.
Suggested Citation
Lord Lindsay, 1961.
"Is Cleavage Between Russia and China Inevitable?,"
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 336(1), pages 53-61, July.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:anname:v:336:y:1961:i:1:p:53-61
DOI: 10.1177/000271626133600107
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:336:y:1961:i:1:p:53-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.