Author
Listed:
- Hardik Shah
- Ashutosh Kumar Anand
- Pallavi Tyagi
Abstract
The case is based on the current performance management system (PMS) followed by THDC India Ltd. (THDCIL). It intends to provide inputs about the importance of sound and objective performance management as a key HR subsystem that helps in planning, measuring and integrating performance, contributing towards organizational and business objectives, and developing a collaborative organizational culture. The case portrays an incident of performance review grievance between a superior (Mr Ajay Kumar) and a subordinate (Mr Prashant Kumar) and shows an organization’s struggle to handle an inefficient performance planning claim by a subordinate. Despite creating a clear mandate and SMART (specific, measurable, attainable, realistic and timely) PMS goals, the HR team and employees are continuously showing resistance to discuss and develop SMART KRAs and KPIs collaboratively. It further talks about the issues in the performance planning process regarding goal setting, providing regular feedback and managing performance effectively while actively engaging employees. It also states how an incident about the unsatisfactory appraisal rating of Mr Prashant Kumar led to organizational chaos and employee dissatisfaction. It further provides insights into managing an aggrieved manager using performance review discussion and coaching. It also intends to give students an insight into the different steps in designing and modifying performance management to suit business requirements. The case may help students appreciate the different roles played by HR, such as employee champion, administrative expert, strategic partner and change agent for aligning and achieving individual, team and organizational goals and objectives. They would also gain knowledge and skills to understand the role of HR in designing, executing and managing the PMS by analysing a real-life situation.
Suggested Citation
Hardik Shah & Ashutosh Kumar Anand & Pallavi Tyagi, 2024.
"THDC India Ltd.—Performance Management System,"
Asian Journal of Management Cases, , vol. 21(2), pages 168-182, September.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:anjomc:v:21:y:2024:i:2:p:168-182
DOI: 10.1177/09728201221139015
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anjomc:v:21:y:2024:i:2:p:168-182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.