IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/amsocr/v89y2024i6p971-1010.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is Separate Still Unequal? New Evidence on School Segregation and Racial Academic Achievement Gaps

Author

Listed:
  • Sean F. Reardon
  • Ericka S. Weathers
  • Erin M. Fahle
  • Heewon Jang
  • Demetra Kalogrides

Abstract

U.S. public schools are racially and economically segregated. Prior research shows that the desegregation of Southern schools beginning in the 1960s led to significant benefits for Black students. Less clear, however, is whether segregation today has the same harmful effects as it did 50 years ago and through what mechanisms segregation continues to affect achievement. We estimate the effects of current-day school segregation on racial achievement gaps using 11 years of data from all U.S. public school districts. We find that racial segregation is strongly associated with the magnitude of achievement gaps in 3rd grade and the rate at which gaps grow from 3rd to 8th grade. The association of racial segregation with achievement-gap growth is completely accounted for by racial differences in school poverty. Thus, racial segregation is harmful because it concentrates minority students in high-poverty schools, which are, on average, less effective than lower-poverty schools. Exploratory analyses show that segregation-related between-school differences in teacher characteristics are associated with unequal learning rates and account for roughly 20 percent of the effect of Black–White racial differences in exposure to poverty. Further research is needed to identify mechanisms linking school segregation to achievement-gap growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Sean F. Reardon & Ericka S. Weathers & Erin M. Fahle & Heewon Jang & Demetra Kalogrides, 2024. "Is Separate Still Unequal? New Evidence on School Segregation and Racial Academic Achievement Gaps," American Sociological Review, , vol. 89(6), pages 971-1010, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:amsocr:v:89:y:2024:i:6:p:971-1010
    DOI: 10.1177/00031224241297263
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00031224241297263
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00031224241297263?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:amsocr:v:89:y:2024:i:6:p:971-1010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.