IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/amsocr/v89y2024i1p159-195.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Threats to Blue Networks: The Effect of Partner Injuries on Police Misconduct

Author

Listed:
  • Linda Zhao
  • Andrew V. Papachristos

Abstract

Police culture creates an “us versus them†dynamic, which, at its worst, treats threats to the “thin blue line†as worthy of group response. Prior research documents such a group threat process as a possible mechanism for police misconduct, but few studies have analyzed the precise network relationships that serve as the conduit for a misconduct response. Using data on misconduct, officer injuries, and officer networks within the Chicago Police Department (CPD) between 2004 and 2015, this study examines the extent to which injuries officers receive from civilians might elicit a misconduct response from officers’ peers, and especially their direct network associates. Findings demonstrate that network ties to injured officers predict higher levels of subsequent misconduct, especially for officers with stronger ties to the injured officer. Furthermore, the effects of peer injury on subsequent misconduct are contingent on the race of the suspect involved: officers whose peers are injured are linked to more use of excessive force, as well as other types of misconduct, when the suspects involved are Black. These findings support our central hypothesis of a networked group threat response that links peer injuries to police misconduct.

Suggested Citation

  • Linda Zhao & Andrew V. Papachristos, 2024. "Threats to Blue Networks: The Effect of Partner Injuries on Police Misconduct," American Sociological Review, , vol. 89(1), pages 159-195, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:amsocr:v:89:y:2024:i:1:p:159-195
    DOI: 10.1177/00031224231208723
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00031224231208723
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00031224231208723?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:amsocr:v:89:y:2024:i:1:p:159-195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.