IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/agspub/v5y2016i1p20-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adivasi Women, Agrarian Change and Forms of Labour in Neo-liberal India

Author

Listed:
  • Archana Prasad

Abstract

This article elaborates the different dimensions of the gendered nature of semi-proletarianization and proletarianization of the adivasi social groups after the period of neo-liberal reforms. It shows that the integration of the adivasis in general, and adivasi women in particular, has been a result of agrarian distress and macro-economic trends that have structured the patterns of dispossession, displacement and urbanization in the last two decades. In doing so, the article contradicts the view which holds that communitarian structures have been playing an important part in the division of labour within adivasi communities. This article also contests the view that there is an autonomous sphere of existence of the subsistence economy of the adivasis and that the role of the adivasi women is largely confined to unpaid labour within the sphere of subsistence. As the analysis here shows, the blurred boundaries between subsistence and commercial activities have ensured that there is hardly autonomous space for the adivasi households to carry out their activities, which has several implications for the life of adivasi women. Lastly, the article counters the oft-repeated proposition that communities and communitarian structures can stand in opposition to the labour market and protect the interests of the adivasi women if they are democratized. It is shown here that both matrilineal and patrilineal communities have similar degrees of semi-proletarianization and proletarianization of adivasi women, although such a process is influenced by regional trends and landholding patterns. Thus, the thesis that communitarian production and distribution systems guide the class formation process does not, in fact, hold in the case of most adivasi regions. Rather, the labour market is guided by macro-economic processes that often neutralize the influence of these structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Archana Prasad, 2016. "Adivasi Women, Agrarian Change and Forms of Labour in Neo-liberal India," Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, Centre for Agrarian Research and Education for South, vol. 5(1), pages 20-49, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:agspub:v:5:y:2016:i:1:p:20-49
    DOI: 10.1177/2277976016665772
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2277976016665772
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2277976016665772?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brinda Karat & Vikas Rawal, 2014. "Scheduled Tribe Households: A Note on Issues of Livelihood," Journal, Review of Agrarian Studies, vol. 4(1), pages 135-158, February-.
    2. Agarwal, Bina, 2013. "Gender and Green Governance: The Political Economy of Women's Presence Within and Beyond Community Forestry," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199683024.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. J. C. Keenan & D. L. Kemp & R. B. Ramsay, 2016. "Company–Community Agreements, Gender and Development," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(4), pages 607-615, June.
    2. Fischer, Harry W. & Ali, Syed Shoaib, 2019. "Reshaping the public domain: Decentralization, the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), and trajectories of local democracy in rural India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 147-158.
    3. François Libois & Jean-Marie Baland & Nicolas Delbart & Subhrendu Pattanayak, 2021. "Community Forest Management: The story behind a success story in Nepal," DeFiPP Working Papers 2106, University of Namur, Development Finance and Public Policies.
    4. Handberg, Øyvind Nystad & Angelsen, Arild, 2015. "Experimental tests of tropical forest conservation measures," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 346-359.
    5. Juliana Nnoko-Mewanu & Luciana Téllez-Chávez & Katharina Rall, 2021. "Protect rights and advance gender equality to mitigate climate change," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 11(5), pages 368-370, May.
    6. Lavanya Suresh, 2021. "Understanding the Relationship Between Sustainability and Ecofeminism in an Indian Context," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 37(1), pages 116-135, March.
    7. H. S. Shylendra, 2015. "Regenerating Forests Through People’s Participation: How Far Has the Joint Forest Management (JFM) Worked?," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 4(2), pages 152-165, July.
    8. Naidu, Sirisha C., 2011. "Rural Livelihoods, Forest Access and Time Use: A Study of Forest Communities in Northwest India," MPRA Paper 31060, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Ramprasad, Vijay, 2021. "Institutional benefit pathways in development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    10. Alemu Mekonnen & Randall Bluffstone, 2017. "Does Community Forest Collective Action Promote Private Tree Planting? Evidence from Ethiopia," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(5), pages 86-106, May.
    11. Farzana Afridi & Vegard Iversen & M. R. Sharan, 2017. "Women Political Leaders, Corruption, and Learning: Evidence from a Large Public Program in India," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 66(1), pages 1-30.
    12. Hanaček, Ksenija & Roy, Brototi & Avila, Sofia & Kallis, Giorgos, 2020. "Ecological economics and degrowth: Proposing a future research agenda from the margins," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    13. Brenda Wyss, 2015. "Seats for the 51 %: Beyond the Business Case for Corporate Board Quotas in Jamaica," The Review of Black Political Economy, Springer;National Economic Association, vol. 42(3), pages 211-246, September.
    14. Ganesh Prasad Pandeya & Shree Krishna Shrestha, 2016. "Does Citizen Participation Improve Local Planning? An Empirical Analysis of Stakeholders’ Perceptions in Nepal," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 11(3), pages 276-304, December.
    15. Chakraborty, Lekha, 2020. "Macroeconomic Policy Coherence for SDG 2030: Evidence from Asia Pacific," Working Papers 20/292, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
    16. Doss, Cheryl R. & Meinzen-Dick, Ruth, 2015. "Collective Action within the Household: Insights from Natural Resource Management," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 171-183.
    17. Bluffstone, Randy & Robinson, Elizabeth & Guthiga, Paul, 2013. "REDD+and community-controlled forests in low-income countries: Any hope for a linkage?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 43-52.
    18. Cook, Nathan J., 2024. "Experimental evidence on minority participation and the design of community-based natural resource management programs," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    19. Kujur, John & S., Irudaya Rajan & Mishra, Udaya S, 2020. "Land Vulnerability among Adivasis in India," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    20. Ryan Stock & Sumit Vij & Asif Ishtiaque, 2021. "Powering and puzzling: climate change adaptation policies in Bangladesh and India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 2314-2336, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:agspub:v:5:y:2016:i:1:p:20-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.