IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rza/ersawp/vy2023iid28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Possible Welfare Benefits of a Basic Income Support: Evidence from a benefit incidence analysis in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Carolyn Chisadza
  • Margaret Chitiga-Mabugu
  • Ramos Mabugu
  • Nicky Nicholls
  • Kehinde Oluwaseun Omotoso
  • Eleni Yitbarek

Abstract

The study investigates the potential welfare effect of basic income support in reducing poverty and inequality in South Africa. Using the 2017 labour force survey and a benefit incidence analysis, we consider three basic income support scenarios: i) universal income support for those aged between 18 and 59; ii) only those who are unemployed receive the benefit; and iii) only unemployed individuals in extremely poor households defined by the food poverty line receive the benefit. Results show that basic income support can reduce poverty and inequality. However, the specific effects of the basic income support will depend on the targeting scenario considered. The universal basic income support is more costly and has higher leakage, with more benefits going to the non-poor. However, this universal support has the biggest overall impact on poverty and inequality reduction because more South Africans receive income support under this scenario. Meanwhile, targeting only the unemployed and the impoverished makes the basic income support more pro-poor and progressive, as well as mitigating the leakage of the benefit to the non-poor. This scenario would however require that an appropriate targeting mechanism is in place.

Suggested Citation

  • Carolyn Chisadza & Margaret Chitiga-Mabugu & Ramos Mabugu & Nicky Nicholls & Kehinde Oluwaseun Omotoso & Eleni Yitbarek, 2023. "Possible Welfare Benefits of a Basic Income Support: Evidence from a benefit incidence analysis in South Africa," ERSA Working Paper Series, Economic Research Southern Africa, vol. 0.
  • Handle: RePEc:rza:ersawp:v::y:2023:i::id:28
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersawps.org/index.php/working-paper-series/article/view/28/9
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rza:ersawp:v::y:2023:i::id:28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Maggi Sigg (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersawps.org/index.php/working-paper-series/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.