IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rss/jnljms/v3i3p1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Procedural Barricades in the Way of Speedy Dispute Resolution

Author

Listed:
  • Raza Ullah Shah
  • Shadi Ullah Khan
  • Sumera Farid
  • Qamar Afaq Qureshi

Abstract

The purpose of civil procedure is to promote the just, efficient, and economical resolution of civil disputes. Although we have a hundred years old procedural lawin Pakistan but it is not free of loopholes which are always manipulated by some veteran lawyers affecting the speed of dispute resolution and even the decision of the court sometimes. To find out these procedural defects causing delay in civil justice in the lower courts of Pakistan the researcher conducted a questionnaire survey in six districts of KPK province. During the survey questionnaire was distributed among lawyers, judges and litigants. The findings of the study proved that the main procedural causes of delay were; lack of proper control mechanism over false and frivolous litigation, technicalities of the civil procedure, defective cost assessment system, lack of modern techniques like that of case management, unrestricted right of amendment of pleadings, and judges’ absolute power of granting adjournments. It is recommended to the legislature to revise procedural law by removing all the technicalities, and by incorporating provisions regarding the imposition of real costs on the losing parties, and application of modern techniques like that of case management etc.

Suggested Citation

  • Raza Ullah Shah & Shadi Ullah Khan & Sumera Farid & Qamar Afaq Qureshi, 2014. "Procedural Barricades in the Way of Speedy Dispute Resolution," International Journal of Management Sciences, Research Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 3(3), pages 112-125.
  • Handle: RePEc:rss:jnljms:v3i3p1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rassweb.org/admin/pages/ResearchPapers/Paper%201_1497253372.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rss:jnljms:v3i3p1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Danish Khalil (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.rassweb.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.