IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ7/7959851.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Correlation breakdowns, spread positions and central counterparty margin models

Author

Listed:
  • David Li
  • Fernando Cerezetti
  • Roy M. Cheruvelil

Abstract

The default of a member of the Nasdaq Clearing commodities market in 2018 and the Covid-19 events in 2020 brought the importance of appropriately measuring breakdowns in market correlation to the attention of risk managers at central counterparties. The sizable price dislocations registered on these occasions suggested that traditional risk models may not be fully equipped to capture such breakdowns. Because correlations are directly impacted by the statistical properties of each variable, any model that lacks the capacity to deal with nonstationarity may inappropriately represent correlations or their alterations. Using an approach that combines a generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity model with dynamic conditional correlation (GARCH-DCC) to accommodate such properties, we aim to study correlation behavior during adverse market conditions and the potential impact on central counterparty margins. We propose a case study on energy commodities, with a specific focus on spread positions for the electricity market. The analysis suggests that correlation breakdowns are more frequent than traditionally expected. When different types of shocks (ie, those of September 2018 and March–May 2020) are considered, it becomes evident that while the magnitudes of the breakdowns may differ, their cycles present a number of similarities. We also recognize the potentially increased margin procyclicality that may be entailed by model corrections to deal with correlation breakdowns, highlighting the challenges of balancing margin responsiveness and stability during adverse market conditions.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ7:7959851
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2024-08/jfmi_Cerezetti_web_final.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ7:7959851. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-financial-market-infrastructures .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.