IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ7/4294266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A network model for central counterparty liquidity risk stress testing under incomplete information

Author

Listed:
  • Max Wong
  • Patrick Ge Pei
  • Lam Xin Yee

Abstract

Most network models in the literature are academic in nature and assume perfect knowledge of nodes and linkages; the result is often simulations that do not reflect the limitations of real-world data. Such research can often make generic statements about the behavior of the entire system, but it is less useful in terms of risk management for a single institution that is part of the network. In practice, a central counterparty (CCP) ecosystem has a simpler network than the interbank network, because many bilateral linkages are replaced by direct many-to-one linkages to the CCP as the central clearer. In addition, the CCP is often the regulator in the ecosystem and thus has information visibility (of both exposures and financial resources) of all the participants. We put forth a realistic network model that maximizes the use of data available to a CCP in order to simulate credit default contagion. We study the resulting liquidity needs of the CCP required to avert the default of the CCP itself. This model combines default simulations and a bipartite network to give a loss distribution that is conditional on a stress state. This risk-based approach has many advantages over the Cover 2 standard approach of the CCP industry.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ7:4294266
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2017-03/A_network_model_for_CCP_liquidity_risk_stress_testing_under_incomplete_information_0.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ7:4294266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-financial-market-infrastructures .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.