IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ7/2317936.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Payment system design and participant operational disruptions

Author

Listed:
  • Ashwin Clarke and Jennifer Hancock

Abstract

ABSTRACT Real-time gross settlement (RTGS) systems often incorporate features designed to economize on liquidity. Such "hybrid features" have the potential to mitigate the systemic impact of operational disruptions of participants. This paper simulates operational disruptions of participants, using data from Australia's RTGS system - the Reserve Bank Information and Transfer System (RITS) - to analyze the effect of these hybrid features on the systemic impact of such disruptions. The results suggest that the bilateral-offset algorithm and sublimit feature in RITS generally mitigate the impact of a participant's operational disruption, even if there is less liquidity committed to the RTGS system. The hybrid features of the Australian RTGS system also mean that the size of the participant suffering the operational disruption has less effect on the systemic impact of that disruption than it would otherwise. While a central queue, in and of itself, would tend to mitigate the impact of a participant's operational disruption, methodological issues make it difficult to draw any conclusions regarding this hybrid feature in this paper. These results could be considered when deciding what features to include in the design of a large-value payment system or when establishing market practices for how participants should respond to an operational incident.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ7:2317936
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/import/protected/digital_assets/7377/jfmi_hancock_web.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ7:2317936. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-financial-market-infrastructures .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.