IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ6/7960472.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the efficiency of pure-play internet banks in South Korea, Japan and China with data envelopment analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Hüseyin Öcal
  • Erdem BaÄŸcı
  • Anton Abdulbasah Kamil

Abstract

This study aims to provide empirical insight into the efficiency of major pure-play internet banks in South Korea, Japan and China (that is, KakaoBank, K Bank, Sony Bank, Jibun Bank andWeBank).We employed the data envelopment analysis model and adopted a profit-oriented approach to measuring the efficiency of the banks between 2017 and 2020. In addition, we ran fixed cross-section regression to measure the relationship between net profit and the input and output variables. We found that in 2017 Sony Bank was run efficiently, but KakaoBank, K Bank and Jibun Bank were run inefficiently. In 2018 WeBank and Sony Bank were efficient, and the efficiency scores of KakaoBank and Jibun Bank were close to 1, meaning they ran fairly efficiently; however, K Bank was run inefficiently. In 2019 KakaoBank, WeBank and Sony Bank were run efficiently, and Jibun Bank’s efficiency score was close to 1, meaning it was run fairly efficiently, but K Bank was run inefficiently. In 2020 KakaoBank and Sony Bank were run efficiently but K Bank was run inefficiently. In addition, Jibun Bank’s efficiency score decreased slightly compared with 2019. Fixed cross-section regression showed the strongest relationship between net profit and noninterest expense. However, the relationship between net profit and noninterest income is also strong. We recommend that banks prioritize managing noninterest expenses and income to achieve sustainable profits.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ6:7960472
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2024-12/jis_Kamil_web_final.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ6:7960472. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-investment-strategies .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.