IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ6/7721271.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strangle to resuscitate: evidence from India

Author

Listed:
  • Peeyush Bangur

Abstract

This study examines the performance of two strangle strategies at different legs to find the best strategy for consistent profit generation when trading on the Indian stock market index Nifty. These strategies have been analyzed on data ranging from 2007 to 2019 on a monthly basis. Both long and short strangle strategies have been used in this analysis. Using newly developed payoff formulas for both strangle strategies, the performance up to three different legs has been measured based on the monthly success rate, profitability (in terms of points earned or lost), risk and return. The results show that the success rate, profitability, risk and return of the short strangle is better than the long strangle at every leg. Further, the risk and return of the third leg of the short strangle have been compared with other legs of the short strangle, and the results show that the third leg of the short strangle has a lower risk and a higher return than the other two legs of the short strangle option strategy. The regression analysis verified these results. Due to its higher success rate and better profitability, the third leg of the short strangle should be preferred by any trader on the Nifty looking for maximum profit generation. The high success rate, better profitability and better return of the short strangle option strategy indicate that volatility in the Nifty is more bearish than bullish, and the Nifty has directionally range-bound characteristics, which increase as the leg increases.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ6:7721271
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2020-12/Strangle_to_resuscitate.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ6:7721271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-investment-strategies .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.