IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ6/2437657.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diffusing explosive portfolio performance evaluation of high frequency traders

Author

Listed:
  • G. Charles-Cadogan

Abstract

ABSTRACT Several analysts report explosive annualized Sharpe ratios (ASRs) for investment portfolio performance evaluation of high frequency traders (HFTers) ranging from 4.3 to 5000. This suggests that the profitability of high frequency trading (HFT) is much higher than that of other actively managed portfolios. In highly competitive financial markets where ASRs for experienced traders are often much less than 2, those numbers imply that the ASR for HFT is misspecified. Thus, HFT performance is incomparable to the performance of experienced traders, hedge funds and other actively managed portfolios. This paper addresses the misspecification problem by introducing an efficient Sharpe ratio (ESR) that diffuses explosive ASRs for HFT so that they are comparable to SRs for other actively managed funds. We derive a subordinate stochastic process for HFT strategy that jumps positively only when the trader executes a successful trade and otherwise stays flat. And we use that process to construct an SR deflator for ESR. We apply the ESR formula to a sample of risk and return data on HFT strategy, and find that the ESR for aggressive HFT is 1.15, medium HFT is 2.88, and passive HFT is 1.43. For the HFT industry as a whole the ESR is between 1.07 and 1.87. Those ESRs for HFT are equivalent to SRs reported for experienced traders, hedge funds multistrategy, convertible option arbitrage, and fund-of-fund strategies. Thus, contrary to reports, the profitability of HFT is in line with industry norms for active portfolio management.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ6:2437657
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/import/protected/digital_assets/9381/Diffusing_explosive_portfolio_performance_evaluation_of_high_frequency_traders.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ6:2437657. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-investment-strategies .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.