Author
Listed:
- Jingyuan Huang
- Yunhan Qu
- Cheng Li
Abstract
This paper uses five-minute high-frequency trading data for the Shanghai Stock Exchange Banks Index (ticker: SH.000134) from 2014 to 2023 as a research sample, and it employs a method based on multifractal characteristics to classify the financial market risk states of listed banks. A long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network is improved by combining it with the SMOTEENN method (itself a combination of the synthetic minority oversampling technique and edited nearest neighbors), and the SMOTEENN-LSTM model is then used to predict these risk states. The results show that the financial market for China’s banking industry exhibits obvious multifractal behavior, and that we can accurately determine the normal state of the market and the states that need attention based on multifractal volatility parameters. The SMOTEENN-LSTM model greatly improves the prediction accuracy of the unmodified LSTM model, and it also significantly outperforms two traditional machine learning models – support vector machines and backpropagation neural networks – with its accuracy reaching 89.27% (as measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve). Fivefold cross-validation shows that, compared with the support vector machine and backpropagation neural network models, the SMOTEENN-LSTM model has superior stability in accuracy indicators such as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the geometric mean, indicating its strong robustness and reliability. This proves it can effectively deal with the problems encountered by traditional models when processing imbalanced data sets. This paper can provide effective tools for financial regulators and financial institutions to better monitor and manage the risks of banking markets and promote their healthy development.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:rsk:journ5:7960310
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:7960310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.