IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ5/7960013.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing credit risk model problems through natural language processing-based clustering and machine learning: insights from validation reports

Author

Listed:
  • Szymon Lis
  • Mariusz Kubkowski
  • Olimpia Borkowska
  • DobromiÅ‚ Serwa
  • JarosÅ‚aw Kuparnik

Abstract

This paper employs clustering and machine learning techniques to analyze validation reports. It provides insights into issues related to credit risk model development, implementation and maintenance. Natural language processing is used in the study to classify issues based on findings raised in validation reports. A total of 657 findings, which are raised for selected credit risk models in a large banking institution between 2019 and 2022, are grouped into nine categories representing different validation dimensions. Next, sentence embedding generation from titles and descriptions of findings is used to create predictors in classification models of the validation dimensions. Several clustering methods are compared in order to group similar findings, effectively identifying common issues in each category with an accuracy level of more than 60%. Further, machine learning algorithms, such as logistic regression and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), are employed to forecast the finding’s category, with XGBoost achieving 80% accuracy. The top 10 predictive words for each category are also determined.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:7960013
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2024-09/jrmv_Lis_web_final.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:7960013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.