IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ5/7959987.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Machine learning prediction of loss given default in government-sponsored enterprise residential mortgages

Author

Listed:
  • Zilong Liu
  • Hongyan Liang

Abstract

In the dynamic field of residential mortgage lending, the accurate estimation of loss given default (LGD) is crucial for effective risk management and model validation. This study investigates LGD using machine learning techniques on a data set of conforming loans from government-sponsored enterprises in the United States between January 2012 and March 2018. The research objectives were threefold: to evaluate the predictive capabilities of various machine learning models for LGD that incorporate a comprehensive set of risk factors; to compare LGD across lender types; and to identify the dominant variables influencing LGD outcomes. Ensemble tree-based methods (specifically the CatBoost, the Gradient-Boosting Regressor and Light Gradient-Boosting Machine regressor algorithms) demonstrated superior accuracy, which was further enhanced through hyperparameter tuning. These models highlighted the importance of loan-specific details and broader economic indicators in LGD estimation. The study found that, unlike banks and nonbanks, fintech firms presented distinct LGD patterns, suggesting diverse risk assessment approaches. Key variables impacting LGD predictions included the mark-to-market loan-to-value ratio, the unpaid balance at default, the liquidation timeline and the mortgage servicer as well as regional economic factors. This paper contributes to the methodological advancement in LGD prediction at the origination stage, which is crucial for proactively managing loan portfolios. It contributes to advancing methodological approaches in LGD prediction and risk model validation, offering valuable insights for lenders and policy makers in refining risk frameworks within the evolving mortgage market.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:7959987
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2024-09/jrmv_Liu_online_early.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:7959987. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.