IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ5/7959891.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of deterioration in rating-model discriminatory power on expected losses

Author

Listed:
  • Siyi Zhou
  • Gary van Vuuren

Abstract

This paper sets out a methodology for estimating the impact on a portfolio’s expected credit loss (ECL) caused by potential model risks in underwriting, such as those arising from scoring models (for retail banking) and rating models (for wholesale banking). Such models are used not only for underwriting assessments but also for the determination of through-the-cycle probabilities of default (for regulatory capital purposes) and point-in-time probabilities of default (for International Financial Reporting Standard 9 ECL reporting). An important metric in credit risk management and assessment – required by regulators and auditors – is the impact on ECL if the model’s Gini coefficient deteriorates. We establish the quantum of Gini weakening that breaches a bank’s internal validation standards (as assessed by a consequently large impact on the ECL), and we formulate an analytical approach, caveated with realistic assumptions, that allows for tractable, computationally simple measurement of ECL as the Gini coefficient worsens. The efficiency gained by the simplifying assumptions comes at the cost of losing granularity and some degree of accuracy.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:7959891
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2024-09/jrmv_van_Vuuren_online_early.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:7959891. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.