IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ5/7959389.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A study of China’s financial market risks in the context of Covid-19, based on a rolling generalized autoregressive score model using the asymmetric Laplace distribution

Author

Listed:
  • Guanghui Han
  • Panpan Liu
  • Yueqiang Zhang
  • Xiaobo Li

Abstract

In order to fully capture the degree of risk in the financial market, we use the asymmetric Laplace distribution (ALD) to describe the distribution characteristics of the financial rate of return in combination with a generalized autoregressive score (GAS) model. We apply the GAS-ALD model to time-varying-parameter rolling estimation of the risk measures value-at-risk (VaR) and expected shortfall (ES), with the aim of building a dynamic risk measurement model for the financial market during the Covid-19 pandemic. Data for representative industry indexes of the Shanghai Stock Exchange are selected for empirical analysis, and parametric and nonparametric methods are used for comparison and backtesting. The results show, first, that the GAS-ALD model has obvious advantages over other tested methods in estimating VaR and ES and predicting the volatility risk of the rate of return, with ES being more accurate at predicting risk in extreme cases than VaR. Second, the pandemic had a big impact on the raw materials and energy industries, but a smaller impact on the financial industry. Based on the research conclusions, recommendations are put forward for three areas: government, regulators and enterprises.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:7959389
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2024-05/jrmv_Han_web_final.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:7959389. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.