IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ5/7959301.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Default prediction based on a locally weighted dynamic ensemble model for imbalanced data

Author

Listed:
  • Jin Xing
  • Guotai Chi
  • Ancheng Pan

Abstract

Default prediction plays a decisive role in the credit decisions of financial institutions. To avoid the bias that can occur in model predictions due to differences in the numbers of defaulting and nondefaulting firms, this study proposes a locally weighted dynamic ensemble model. To construct more diverse base classifiers, ten imbalanced data sampling methods and five heterogeneous classifiers are introduced to balanced bagging to select the base classifiers with the highest accuracy under different data distributions. To reduce overfitting and information loss, the locally weighted dynamic ensemble method is used to obtain the final prediction result. Experiments on three publicly available data sets and a data set of Chinese listed firms validate that the predictive performance of the proposed ensemble model is superior to that of three other heterogeneous ensemble models, seven homogeneous ensemble models and five individual models in predicting the imbalanced data. Moreover, the proposed ensemble model can predict financial institutions’ default status five years ahead.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:7959301
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2024-05/jrmv_chi_web_final.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:7959301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.