IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ5/7958593.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forecasting the default risk of Chinese listed companies using a gradient-boosted decision tree based on the undersampling technique

Author

Listed:
  • Shanshan Wang
  • Guotai Chi
  • Ying Zhou
  • Li Chen

Abstract

Default prediction is of interest to the creditors, customers and suppliers of any firm as well as to policymakers and current and potential investors. Imbalanced classification for default prediction is considered a crucial issue. Therefore, this study proposes a default risk prediction model using a gradient-boosted decision tree (GBDT) based on the random undersampling (RUS) technique. We build a default prediction model based on 29 indicators and five different time windows. The model has two steps. First, the proposed RUS-GBDT model adopts the undersampling approach to generate different training samples based on the imbalance ratio of the training data. Then, the parameter of the GBDT is adaptively tuned with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the predictive model for the selected training sample. We analyze the optimal imbalance ratio of the different training samples and compare the model’s prediction performance with that of several other classification methods including logistic regression and support vector machines. Our experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model performs better than the other classifiers with respect to predicting and classifying the default status of listed companies in China.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:7958593
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2024-01/jrmv_Wang_web_final.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:7958593. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.