IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ5/7957515.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the mitigation of valuation uncertainty risk: the importance of a robust proxy for the “cumulative state of market incompletenessâ€

Author

Listed:
  • Oghenovo Adewale Obrimah

Abstract

Suppose the same set of assets enters a primary market in either a monotone decreasing or monotone increasing sequence of asset risk. This study shows that the errors that attend the valuations of those assets in the context of the two different orderings are noncoincident. The sequence in which new assets arrive within a market is thus a source of valuation uncertainty risk. The formal theory shows that both asset risk and valuation uncertainty risk are mitigated if investors condition valuations of new assets on a dynamically evolving intertemporal mechanism that has parameterization as an explicit robust measure for the “cumulative state of [market] incompleteness†(CSI). Theoretically, relative to every preceding state, the CSI is a sufficient measure for the severity of market-conditioned valuation uncertainty risk. Although the derivation of a specific measure for the CSI is beyond the scope of this study, the formal theory arrives at three mathematically specified risk metrics that approximate the properties of the CSI. Let q and M denote, respectively, the individual initial public offering quality and the CSI. The CSI has the explicit parameterization Mt = ⋃ts=1(qs | Ms-1), as is expected of any well-defined measure, is self-propagating.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:7957515
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2023-09/jrmv_obrimah_web_final.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:7957515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.