IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ5/7952276.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

General bounds on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and other performance measures when only a single sensitivity and specificity point is known

Author

Listed:
  • Roger M. Stein

Abstract

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves are often used to quantify the performance of predictive models used in diagnosis, risk stratification and rating systems. The ROC area under the curve (AUC) summarizes the ROC in a single statistic, which also provides a probabilistic interpretation that is isomorphic to the Mann– Whitney–Wilcoxon test. In many settings, such as those involving diagnostic tests for diseases or antibodies, information about the ROC is not reported; instead the true positive .TP/ and true negative .TN/ rates are reported for a single threshold value. We demonstrate how to calculate the upper and lower bounds for the ROC AUC, given a single .TP; TN/ pair. We use simple geometric arguments only, and we present two examples of real-world applications from medicine and finance, involving Covid-19 diagnosis and credit card fraud detection, respectively. In addition, we introduce formally the notion of “pathological†ROC curves and “well-behaved†ROC curves. In the case of well-behaved ROC curves, the bounds on the AUC may be made tighter. In certain special cases involving pathological ROC curves that result from what we term “George Costanza†classifiers, we may transform predictions to obtain well-behaved ROC curves with higher AUC than the original decision process. Our results also enable the calculation of other quantities of interest, such as Cohen’s d or the Pearson correlation between a diagnostic outcome and an actual outcome. These results facilitate the direct comparison of reported performance when model or diagnostic performance is reported for only a single score threshold.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:7952276
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2022-08/jrmv_stein_web.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:7952276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.