IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ5/7951416.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An end-to-end deep learning approach to credit scoring using CNN + XGBoost on transaction data

Author

Listed:
  • Lars Ole Hjelkrem
  • Petter Eilif de Lange
  • Erik Nesset

Abstract

The performance of credit scoring models is closely linked to a bank’s profitability. Application scoring models for potential customers usually perform worse than models for existing customers. This is due to the lender not having access to the financial behavioral data of potential customers. Access to such data about potential customers could therefore increase a bank’s profitability. Open banking application programming interfaces (APIs) provide access to 90 days of historical data on potential customers’ balances and transactions. We examine the performance of credit scoring models developed using such data from a Norwegian bank. We find that traditional regression models perform poorly, while machine learning (ML) methods can provide models that perform satisfactorily based on these data alone. Further, we find that the best performing models are based on an end-to-end deep learning approach, where machine learning algorithms create explanatory variables based on non-aggregated data. These results indicate that data available through the open banking APIs can be an important data source when banks assess the creditworthiness of potential customers. In combination with end-to-end deep learning methods they have the potential to increase the performance of a bank’s application credit scoring models and thus increase the bank’s profitability.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:7951416
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2022-08/jrmv_hjelkrem_web.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:7951416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.