IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ5/7885046.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A prudent loss given default estimation for mortgages. II

Author

Listed:
  • Bogie Ozdemir
  • Emma Huang

Abstract

When the possibility of another house price correction continues to be a concern, it is important to accurately estimate loss given default (LGD) for mortgage portfolios and be able to stress test those portfolios effectively. In this paper we introduce a prudent methodology to do so. The methodology builds on the earlier Journal of Risk Model Validation paper by Ozdemir, which provides an accurate estimation of “workout†LGD by directly modeling the house value at default by incorporating market effects and potential appraisal biases. Improving on it, in this extension the probability of “curing†and the probability of full payment after default (“exit†) are explicitly modeled with respect to the inverse of the loan-to-value (LTV) ratio. This makes the LGD estimation more accurate and risk sensitive, and particularly suitable for stress testing purposes. While the methodology is presented in a mortgage setting, it can easily be applied to all types of secured lending where the collateral value relative to exposure at default (ie, the LTV) is likely to influence the potential outcomes following the default.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:7885046
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2021-12/A_prudent_LGD_estimation_for_mortgages_II_final.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:7885046. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.