IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ5/7796971.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A verification model to capture option risk and hedging based on a modified underlying beta

Author

Listed:
  • Chuan-He Shen
  • Yang Liu

Abstract

The mining and hedging of option volatility information are the core issues of stock option markets. This paper analyzes the relationship between option risk and expected return from the perspective of the underlying beta, and estimates the degree of correlation. As the assumptions of the capital asset pricing model and Black–Scholes model are not consistent with the actual situation in the financial market, we use applied statistical models to introduce kurtosis and skewness, and to introduce curvature and high-order-moment error terms to optimize the underlying beta model. We then develop a verification model for mining option risk and hedging by employing the modified underlying beta. We verify the hedging performance of the above model by choosing different market samples, such as the China, Hong Kong and US financial markets. The results show that the hedging performance of the optimized underlying beta model in the US market is most satisfactory, followed by the Hong Kong market and then the Chinese mainland market. Meanwhile, the hedging effect of the underlying beta model improved by curvature and high-order-moment error terms is superior to that of the model of the underlying beta adjusted by the kurtosis and skewness.

Suggested Citation

  • Chuan-He Shen & Yang Liu, . "A verification model to capture option risk and hedging based on a modified underlying beta," Journal of Risk Model Validation, Journal of Risk Model Validation.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:7796971
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation/7796971/a-verification-model-to-capture-option-risk-and-hedging-based-on-a-modified-underlying-beta
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:7796971. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.