IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ5/7554006.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An alternative statistical framework for credit default prediction

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Shamsu Uddin
  • Guotai Chi
  • Tabassum Habib
  • Ying Zhou

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to introduce a gradient-boosting model that is robust to high-dimensional data and can produce a strong classifier by combining the predictors of many weak classifiers for credit default risk prediction. Therefore, this method is recommended for practical applications. This study compares the gradient-boosting model with four other well-known classifiers, namely, a classification and regression tree (CART), logistic regression (LR), multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) and a random forest (RF). Six real-world credit data sets are used for model validation. The performance of each model is compared using six performance measures, and a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve is plotted for the best classifiers of each data set. The empirical findings confirm that the gradient-boosting model is reliable and efficient across all of the performance criteria. In addition, LR and CART exhibit superior performances. The contributions of this study have theoretical and practical implications, as credit default risk prediction is a complicated and always contemporary issue.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:7554006
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2020-06/An_alternative_statistical_framework_for_credit_default_prediction.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:7554006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.