IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ5/7129766.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validation of index and benchmark assignment: adequacy of capturing tail risk

Author

Listed:
  • Lukasz Prorokowski

Abstract

This paper provides practical recommendations for the validation of risk models under the Targeted Review of Internal Models (TRIM). The European Central Bank has recently launched the first phase of the TRIM, which investigates the ability of banks’ internal risk models to adequately capture tail risk in underlying portfolio items. Against this background, using empirical examples, this paper reviews statistical tools for validating the assumption that a given risk proxy (in this case, an equity index/fund benchmark) adequately represents tail risk in the returns of an individual asset (in this case, equity/fund). Our paper reviews the following validation tools for comparing the return distributions of the proxy and the underlying assets: the Kappa coefficient, the paired t-test and the two-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. In doing so, this paper shows the shortcomings of using certain statistical tools to assess the ability to capture tail risk. The motivation of this paper is to advise on specific aspects of the validation practice that have grown in importance under the TRIM framework but remain under-researched, with no academic studies explicitly advising on the validation of the risk proxy assignment.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:7129766
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2019-12/Validation_of_index_and_benchmark_assignment_final_0.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:7129766. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.